So I’ve been engaged in some pretty interesting conversations lately. For example, last Friday night I went dancing, and a young man chose to start a conversation with me by shouting “Woo!” at me. Then he kept talking, and started dancing way, way too close to me, all the while holding some beverage that seems to be called “Sparks”. (If I understand it correctly, it’s a combination of alcohol and caffeine. I think he’d had about eight at that point, and I’m now convinced that stuff should be illegal.) Anyway, when I eventually told him he was harshing my buzz (having adjusted my language use to better match that of my audience), he told me that the only thing that could harsh his buzz would be if I walked away. (God that’s a good line, eh? I felt pretty.) Sorry, dude, but your buzz just got harshed.
(I also had a rather curious conversation with a cab driver, who I nicknamed in my head “Mr. Magoo”.* It was raining pretty much sideways, and he picked me up, I told him where I wanted to go – a numbered street that intersects a lettered street. Sure, DC can sometimes be confusing, what with all the circles, but since we started out on a lettered street that intersects a numbered street, I didn’t think he’d have such a hard time locating my destination. And in fact he didn’t have such a hard time, although he somehow found it necessary to repeatedly ask me what street we were crossing next. Given that I intended to pay him for not only the temporary use of the inside of his (smelly) vehicle, but also his navigational skills, I grudgingly helped him out the best I could, but I sort of wonder where he is now. Or if he even knows.)
Some other conversations have been less amusing, however. I think we all know that I can be brutally honest, say what I mean, don’t sugarcoat things, etc. And I expect to be challenged a lot.
So say you write a blog. It’s important to remember that a blog and its writer (or writers, as the case may be) are two different entities. I know that lots and lots of people, many of whom I know and like, don’t enjoy reading my blog. Criticisms my blog has received include:
- Chattiness
- Pretention, arrogance, condescension, pomposity, wielding my vocabulary as if it was a weapon, etc.
- Too many parentheses
- Blurry pictures
- Boring content (too many pictures of my cats, endless going on about the food I eat and make, silly stories about things I see on the bus)
Fine. All that may or may not be true. Doesn’t matter one way or another, because I write my blog to entertain myself first, others second. I didn’t insist you come here, don’t pester you if you don’t, couldn’t give a good god damn if I was the only person reading my blog. Attack it as you see fit, and if your attack is well-written, not unreasonably hostile, and on topic, I’ll even post it here. I don’t take criticism of my blog personally, because “the author of Overly Verbal” is only one of the very many identities that interact to make me who I am.
When I don’t like reading a blog, I simply avoid it. When a blog I enjoy reading links to a blog I do not enjoy reading, I might say so, but when I do say so, I’m not criticizing the author(s), I’m criticizing the blog.
Blogs about politics, for example, tend to not interest me at all, particularly because my political beliefs are so remarkably different from those of most other people. I am a woman who does not consider herself a feminist, an atheist who strongly believes in the separation of church and state but just as strongly believes in the right to worship. I’m fiscally conservative and socially liberal, lean toward Libertarianism but register as a Republican. And I am not only not ashamed of my beliefs or my party affiliation, I am fully capable of defending them when the need arises. (Heck, I’ve even sometimes changed hearts and minds, particularly on the issue of school vouchers. While the public school system does a reasonably good job with the middle 80 percent of students, it does a miserable, potentially dangerous job with those in the top and bottom 10 percents. Since I expect any children I might have to be in the top 10 percent, I would like the freedom to choose where they go to school, and having the government give me back some of the money they would have spent educating my children would make it a heck of a lot easier to do so.)
And I know that some political issues are so intensely personal for me that I am incapable of talking about those issues without getting emotional: abortion, gun control, Israel, animal rights. I don’t generally talk about those topics here, therefore, because when I get angry I can be not only shrill, but completely insufferable.
So I’ve got friends who are politically active, and I like those people quite a bit, but I can’t participate in rallies or protests with them, because my ideas are so complicated that they simply don’t fit on a placard. It offends my delicate sensibilities when people set up false dichotomies when the issue is much more grey** than black and white.
(Actually, some of my beliefs are so simple they can be stated in six words or less, but there are only about five of those:
- Be nice to animals and children.
- Reduce, reuse, recycle.
- Read more books.
Well, okay, three.)
So when someone doesn’t agree with me about an issue, political or otherwise, I take that pretty much as a given. And if someone doesn’t agree with me about something I’ve said on my blog, I expect that disagreement to be handled in a number of different ways.
Some people might huffily decide never to read my blog again. (Don’t let the door hit your ass on the way out!)
Other people might call me names.***
Other people might choose to take the words I write here and post them on their own blog, thereby unleashing a flurry of comments about those words, and in some of those comments the author might be gently reprimanded for proclaiming intellectualism but admitting to doing things that are anti-intellectual. I mean, that’s unlikely to happen to words I write, because I don’t often do things that serve to incrementally break down the very core of civilized society, but nobody’s perfect, so it could happen. And if that were to happen, I’d probably write another entry to my blog, explaining myself further, or just sucking it up if it turned out I was wrong. (You may not be aware that I once was wrong. It was July 21, 2007.) (Since I’m only wrong about once a year, I guess I’m due again. I’m sure it’ll be fun.)
Anyway, one takes on some risk when one chooses to publish words to the Internet on a blog. You might say something that people don’t agree with, but because you said it digitally, it can be disseminated endlessly, discussed by people who have never met you, taken out of context, judged, mocked, or ignored. I’m cool with that, otherwise I wouldn’t write a blog.
If you’re not cool with that? Don’t write a blog, individually or as part of a group. It’s that simple.
Finally, and just for the record, I remain steadfast in my conviction (as stated earlier in the comments section at Oklahomeless) that when one encounters a book in a bookstore and finds the contents of that book distasteful, it is simply unacceptable to move that book to a different section of the store, turn it around so its cover cannot be seen, put it behind another book one likes better, or otherwise prevent people searching for that book from finding it easily, right where the bookstore employees shelved it. I don’t think people who engage in that sort of behavior are bad people, necessarily, I just think they need to be a little better educated in the basic, fundamental principles of American society, where each of us are equally free to exchange ideas without having the will of others imposed upon us.
I try not to speak for other people, but I think it’s safe to say that regular readers of my blog share that conviction, and are willing and able to defend your right to read whatever you damned well please without interference, however minor that interference might seem. If you’re a regular reader who disagrees with me about this, let’s discuss it in the comments section, because I had you all wrong.
And if you’re a new reader, wandering over from somewhere else in hopes of being engaged in a lively, intelligent discussion about the matter, welcome. I’m not sure how lively the discussion will be, as I expect most people to simply agree with me, but one never knows.
_____
* In case anyone is alarmed that I’m being insensitive to the visually-impaired, I’d like to point out that I’m highly sensitive to the topic, because I have a degenerative retinal disease. That’s why I nicknamed him that in my head, instead of saying it out loud. If you have a visual impairment, and are offended by my remark, feel free to contact me personally so we can discuss the matter further.
And if you just want to read a truly touching book about macular degeneration (which is not the kind I have – mine’s lattice degeneration, which is far less damaging), try this one: Henry Grunwald’s Twilight: Losing Sight, Gaining Insight. I’ll lend you my copy, if you’re local, or you can find it in your local bookstore. (Probably in the memoir section, depending on the types of people who hang out in your local bookstore.)
** Is it pretentious to spell the word grey with an E? I think it might be, but that’s how I do it.
*** Name-calling has been beneath me since I was approximately four years old, but that’s not to say that my blog doesn’t include some gentle ribbing among friends. (Goethe, for example, called me “ignorant” in a comment he made yesterday, but that’s okay, because he’s an over-educated boob.)